Beyond the Aussies' wildest dreams could they have believed they would be leading two-nil in the current historic rivalry following just only six days of play.
They were placed under severe pressure by England in the first Test in Perth, before executing a remarkable reversal.
This propelled them riding a crest of self-belief going into the Brisbane encounter, where they delivered the English side a masterclass in how to play the longest format, especially day-night Test cricket.
This series is not dead, but it's not far from it. Should England fail to win the third Test, the situation could become embarrassing.
I gained a close look at England's style during the 2023 Ashes in the UK. For all of the talk regarding this trip representing their opportunity to finally win a victory in Australia, existed a lot of scepticism in this country concerning the manner the English team performs.
Was the English batting lineup be suited to Australian conditions? Would they attempt big shots and find ways to lose their wickets? Might they collapse under the pressure during crucial phases?
Right now, all of the Australian observers who were sceptical regarding England are being proved validated.
There exists much I admire regarding England's mindset. I appreciate it when sportspeople compete fearlessly, because that helps them push the boundaries of what is possible.
However, I disagree with the idea that pressure or expectation should be eliminated. The great players thrive under pressure, and the best teams hold each other are accountable.
"Yes, there were the coaches such as Simpson and John Buchanan, but it was the skipper and senior players who always ran the team environment."
Even when a young player, I felt like I had permission to voice my opinion. Every player assumed ownership of the team.
Then, if a player deviated from the standard, they were held consequences from their teammates. If someone made a mistake on more than one occasion - an uncommon occurrence very often - they were told.
Our team contained several dominant characters - none bigger than the great Shane Warne - but we all felt that our actions was for the team and for each other. Matthew Hayden often stated we pulled together due to the affection we shared, so extensive was the duration we spent together.
That accountability, responsibility and flexibility collectively manifested when we stepped on to the field as a team.
Admittedly, these factors are easier when a team secures victories, which England are currently not experiencing right now.
My concern regarding England stemmed from the philosophy of a rigid style yielded a culture that lacks accountability.
It was almost that England had concluded pitches must conform to them, rather than England adapting their strategy to the prevailing conditions.
Finally, in the aftermath of the defeat in Brisbane, it appears realisation has dawned.
Both Ben Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum conceded problems exist, and they need take action about it.
I have no issue with the statements the England leaders said in public after the Brisbane Test. If Stokes and McCullum have been strong publicly, one can be sure they have been even more forceful behind closed doors.
Will we now see an evolved form of Bazball? As I mentioned, I like the aspect of playing fearlessly. If England can incorporate the elements of pressure and mutual accountability, then they may still possess to something.
For all that England have been criticised, Australia merits a huge amount for their performance.
If England had been told they would play an Australia team without all of Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Lyon, they would have been delighted with glee.
And yet, Australia achieved victory at the Gabba with each of their other players rising to the occasion.
Mitchell Starc has proven absolutely outstanding, ably assisted by Michael Neser, Boland and Brendan Doggett.
Alex Carey put in an absolute masterclass with the gloves, possibly the best display of keeping I have witnessed - and I shared a dressing room with Ian Healy and Gilchrist.
Perhaps the biggest revelation from an Australian perspective is the shift within the top order.
Prior to the contest, when it appeared there was considerable discussion regarding Australia's lineup, I said there was only really one question concerning one position - batter Usman Khawaja's opening partner.
That debate has been settled, just not in the manner anyone predicted.
Ever since Batsman Travis Head volunteered to bat as an opener following Khawaja's injury during the Perth Test, Australia has appeared like a different team. Now, there seems to be the opportunity for Head and Jake Weatherald to establish themselves as the first-wicket duo.
Khawaja might find it tough to get back in, although Australia coach Andrew McDonald has indicated he might feature in the middle order.
Fitness issues will result in English speedster Mark Wood and Australia's Josh Hazlewood being absent for the third Test and the remainder of the series.
This represents an unfortunate situation for both athletes. I understand the immense effort it is to bowl fast, the effort that goes into coming back from setbacks, and how eager both players were to participate fully in this contest. They are surely devastated.
The Adelaide Oval will be a good pitch, offering something for batters and bowlers alike. Australia will certainly reinstate spinner Lyon and it seems Cummins will return to captain the side.
Australia will remember how England recovered from a two-nil deficit to draw the previous series. They are aware England poses a threat.
This time, they have England in a stranglehold and should not relent merely because key players are coming back. They cannot becoming overconfident.
An Australian side must always believe it is capable of winning each match it contests, therefore this team should be thinking for a 5-0.
England will know they are compelled but to turn things around in Adelaide. If they don't, could indeed lead to 5-0.
A seasoned gaming enthusiast with over a decade of experience in lottery analysis and casino reviews.
